<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taylor family DNA — preliminary results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nltaylor.net/sketchbook/archives/553/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nltaylor.net/sketchbook/archives/553</link>
	<description>medieval and modern genealogy, memory and history — part of nltaylor.net</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 02:34:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: a genealogist&#8217;s sketchbook &#8250; Taylor DNA update</title>
		<link>http://nltaylor.net/sketchbook/archives/553/comment-page-1#comment-20190</link>
		<dc:creator>a genealogist&#8217;s sketchbook &#8250; Taylor DNA update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 05:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nltaylor.net/sketchbook/?p=553#comment-20190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] news! Following work begun in the summer and already blogged here, and here, we now have another matching DNA sample from another branch of our Taylor family, which pushes the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] news! Following work begun in the summer and already blogged here, and here, we now have another matching DNA sample from another branch of our Taylor family, which pushes the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a genealogist&#8217;s sketchbook &#8250; Taylor DNA — toward a historical haplotype</title>
		<link>http://nltaylor.net/sketchbook/archives/553/comment-page-1#comment-19498</link>
		<dc:creator>a genealogist&#8217;s sketchbook &#8250; Taylor DNA — toward a historical haplotype</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nltaylor.net/sketchbook/?p=553#comment-19498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] tree permits a certain degree of confidence assessing the discrepancies. The chart I put into an earlier post showed the descent of the three test subjects from two sons of John Taylor (d. 1741). Here I [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tree permits a certain degree of confidence assessing the discrepancies. The chart I put into an earlier post showed the descent of the three test subjects from two sons of John Taylor (d. 1741). Here I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nat Taylor</title>
		<link>http://nltaylor.net/sketchbook/archives/553/comment-page-1#comment-19072</link>
		<dc:creator>Nat Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nltaylor.net/sketchbook/?p=553#comment-19072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What does it all mean?  Here&#039;s what I just wrote to a cousin (the black triangle on the right, above):

Essentially, we are getting in on the ground floor of a new way of looking at families.  But we have to be patient: over the next few years I expect more genetic matches will certainly turn up, and shed new light not only on branches of this family in the US, but on other Taylors (in the UK or in the States) who may be related to us from back before our own first Taylor ancestor came to Virginia.  

Because the &#039;Taylor&#039; surname is so common, and comes originally not from a unique person or place, but from an occupation practiced everywhere, most Taylor families are unrelated to each other. In fact there may be as many as hundreds of genetically distinct Taylor families in the English-speaking world--each one descended from a different tailor who began to use his occupation as his surname.  Finding more of &#039;our&#039; Taylors will be like needles in a haystack--but that is something that computers and genetic databases will be able to do as curiosity-based genetic testing becomes cheaper and more common.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does it all mean?  Here&#8217;s what I just wrote to a cousin (the black triangle on the right, above):</p>
<p>Essentially, we are getting in on the ground floor of a new way of looking at families.  But we have to be patient: over the next few years I expect more genetic matches will certainly turn up, and shed new light not only on branches of this family in the US, but on other Taylors (in the UK or in the States) who may be related to us from back before our own first Taylor ancestor came to Virginia.  </p>
<p>Because the &#8216;Taylor&#8217; surname is so common, and comes originally not from a unique person or place, but from an occupation practiced everywhere, most Taylor families are unrelated to each other. In fact there may be as many as hundreds of genetically distinct Taylor families in the English-speaking world&#8211;each one descended from a different tailor who began to use his occupation as his surname.  Finding more of &#8216;our&#8217; Taylors will be like needles in a haystack&#8211;but that is something that computers and genetic databases will be able to do as curiosity-based genetic testing becomes cheaper and more common.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
